Teams looking for proof-of-purchase verification software usually have the same tension: fraud exposure is rising, but heavier proof journeys also damage response and satisfaction if they are handled badly.
Kosmos handles that route with POPSCAN. It gives promotions, reward and sampling mechanics a clearer way to check product and receipt evidence while keeping legitimate participants moving.
Use the problem, opportunity and best-fit pattern first. If those three markers do not sound right, move sideways before you commit to the wrong product page or brief.
Manual receipt review, easy-to-fake claims and inconsistent market rules create a workflow that is expensive to operate and difficult to defend at scale.
Improve proof quality without turning the journey into operational theatre. Reduce fraud pressure, keep genuine users moving and make exception handling easier to justify.
Best for promotions, rewards, competitions and sampling programmes where proof quality matters commercially but heavy friction would cost response.
POPSCAN is the verification layer. ONECARD and Payment Services appear when verified claims need to turn into controlled value delivery or settlement afterwards.
A proof-of-purchase verification layer for campaigns, rewards, competitions and sampling, with structured product and receipt checks.
Best for campaign, sampling and reward mechanics where proof quality has to improve without punishing legitimate customers.
Useful when verified claims should unlock digital rewards rather than an ad-hoc fulfilment process.
Useful when the end of the route is not a reward but a controlled reimbursement or claimant payout.
The route needs better evidence, not just more manual review.
Ask for barcode, product or receipt evidence only where the mechanic genuinely needs it, rather than burying every entrant in the same friction.
Use product checks, receipt understanding and rule logic to separate straightforward passes from cases that need a closer look.
Pass legitimate users into reward or payout journeys without forcing operations teams to rebuild the result manually.
The common mistake is treating every participant as if they are equally risky.
Verification is often only the middle of the journey.
ONECARD becomes relevant when a verified claim should trigger digital reward delivery. Payment Services becomes relevant when the end state is a refund, rebate or controlled claimant payout instead.
POPSCAN is derived from operational environments where barcode checks, receipt evidence and exception handling have to work under commercial pressure. That gives the product a stronger footing than a theoretical anti-fraud layer.
Start with the nearest operational evidence. If the pressure belongs to a neighbouring route, move sideways before you commit to the wrong product page or brief.
No. The right route depends on the promotion mechanic. Sometimes product or barcode evidence is enough; sometimes receipt understanding is necessary.
That is the point. A governed route applies stronger checks where they matter instead of making every legitimate participant pay the same friction cost.
Usually immediately after proof acceptance. That is where ONECARD or Payment Services can join the route if value needs to move in a controlled way.
No. It is useful anywhere the commercial cost of weak proof handling is already visible, even if the volume is not yet huge.
Show us the current claim route and we can map where POPSCAN fits, where the friction really belongs, and what the adjacent reward or payout path should look like.
Context carried through: use-case page, product route and source path.
